
Can one push the underlying principle to its limits? What is the right tactic to get to the point where the systemic behavior proliferates variations?
Peter Eisenman’s term of repetition with difference is certainly one determining criteria.
a) Inversion: An exterior surface is programmed on both sides, example: the roofscape being populated and having surface characteristics related to access and connection to other surfaces and planes below.
b) Continuity: A project engages predominantly multiple surfaces, which are interconnected such that the project utilizes as an example “roofed-over” facades, where one single surface receives a multitude of functions and properties. Like it fluently changes from roof to façade to floor and back etc..remember Ito…
c)Incongruity: A geometry emphasizes an inscriptive procedure of free massing with strategies like volume-within-volume sections. Some of the characteristic spatial results are incongruous and residual spaces, which are either constant in their succession or interrupted into separated and non-regular parts. ..remember the artists box…poche or not poche…
techniques:
the pleat/ the fold: folds in the surface might create not only a deformation but lead to structural rigidness
the layers: either an offset to stack sheets, or a slice in the surface to attach to other sheets-stripes
the weave: bended stripes, or twisted bands form mesh assemblies which also lead to structural stiffness
the eggcrate: multiple perpendicular surfaces joined for a common seam create light but stable structures
1.Develop the three major pattern generations further, by increasing now the scale according to the following dimensions:
Minimum distance between floor-floor/ roof-floor/ wall-wall about 3m.
2.Prepare Video clip of 3D pattern assembly from individual units to wholes for each of the 3 = pattern transformations as of last assignment in an animation. Choose one of the four schematic strategies A,B,C,or D for each pattern tree generation. due m10-01




